Recruitment
Referrals convert twenty times better than web leads.
Benchmarks drawn from more than 460 brands show gross lead volume growing modestly while system growth depends more and more on conversion. Across the industry only about 1.5% of leads become signed agreements, and the channels differ enormously: franchisee referrals and internal networks convert at 18.9%, trade shows at 13.5%, broker networks at 3.9%, general internet and paid digital at 0.9%, and brand development websites at 0.6%.
The pattern is trust. A candidate referred by a satisfied franchisee arrives having seen a unit's economics first-hand; a portal lead arrives having filled in a form. The existing network's satisfaction is, in effect, the most efficient sales channel a brand has.
Scroll sideways to see all columns
| Lead source | Lead-to-agreement conversion | Cost profile |
|---|---|---|
| Franchisee referrals and internal networks | 18.9% | Low; often a referral reward paid to the franchisee |
| Trade shows and expos | 13.5% | Moderate to high fixed exhibition and travel cost |
| Franchise broker networks | 3.9% | High; commissions often 40% to 50% or more of the initial fee |
| General internet and paid digital | 0.9% | Blended cost per lead of roughly $50 to $350+ |
| Brand development websites | 0.6% | Content and search cost; an information anchor for candidates |
Intermediaries
Brokers, sales organisations and Discovery Day.
Broker networks deliver pre-screened candidates at a high variable cost, with commissions commonly 40% to 50% or more of the initial franchise fee. Franchise sales organisations go further, acting as an outsourced development team that qualifies leads, manages broker relationships and runs discovery for emerging brands.
Aggressive multi-unit selling through these channels has drawn regulators' attention. California's SB 919 requires franchise brokers to register with the state and give buyers a disclosure document stating what the franchisor pays them, once its provisions are funded and operative; NASAA has published a model act for other states. A brand that relies on brokers should expect its compensation structure to be read by the candidate.
In a disciplined process, qualified candidates move through discovery calls, a review of Item 19 with the development team, validation calls with current franchisees and a Discovery Day at headquarters, where published benchmarks put closing rates at 65% to 85% of attendees.
Sold, not opened
A signed agreement pays no royalties.
After the sale comes the sold-but-not-opened pipeline: units with signed agreements stuck in site search, lease negotiation and municipal permitting. The franchisee spends working capital, the franchisor carries support costs, and nobody collects a royalty.
The burden falls hardest on small systems. In networks of fewer than 75 units, units sold but not yet open amount to 13.3% of the active system; in networks of 300 or more, 3.8%.
Scroll sideways to see all columns
| System size | Units sold, not opened | Share of active system | What it costs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise (300+ units) | ~5,500+ | 3.8% | Absorbed by in-house real estate teams across a large royalty base |
| Mid-market (75–300 units) | ~1,900+ | 7.7% | Field support diverted into construction management |
| Emerging (under 75 units) | ~850+ | 13.3% | Initial fees spent before any royalty arrives |
